Security

Connected Physical Security Devices – The Trojan Horse for Cyber Attacks

Last year, we estimated that world expenditure on Physical Security products was $28Bn. Our latest report on Cyber Security shows that of some 10 building technology elements, physical security products were perceived as having the highest risk to cyber security threats. Causing the greatest level of concern here are video cameras, given the recent hacking of huge numbers of surveillance cameras, which were exploited by the Mirai virus and used in DDoS attacks. When compromised smart building devices can have a profound impact on our physical surroundings and could allow a malicious actor to cause severe damage without having physical access to the building. You have to wonder... why spend some $28Bn on security products and so little on protective measures to prevent cyber attacks? The attacker’s motivation & objectives are rarely to compromise the physical security or building management system but to use it as the Trojan Horse to gain entry into corporate networks. […]

Stay ahead of the pack

with the latest independent smart building research and thought leadership.

Have an account? Login

Subscribe Now for just $200 per year per user (just $17 USD per month) for Access to Quality Independent Smart Building Research & Analysis!

What Exactly Do you Get?

  • Access to Website Articles and Notes. Unlimited Access to the Library of over 1,700 Articles Spanning 10 Years.
  • 10% discount on ALL Memoori Research reports for Subscribers! So if you only buy ONE report you will get your subscription fee back!
  • Industry-leading Analysis Every Week, Direct to your Inbox.
  • AND Cancel at any time
Subscribe Now

Last year, we estimated that world expenditure on Physical Security products was $28Bn. Our latest report on Cyber Security shows that of some 10 building technology elements, physical security products were perceived as having the highest risk to cyber security threats. Causing the greatest level of concern here are video cameras, given the recent hacking of huge numbers of surveillance cameras, which were exploited by the Mirai virus and used in DDoS attacks.

When compromised smart building devices can have a profound impact on our physical surroundings and could allow a malicious actor to cause severe damage without having physical access to the building. You have to wonder... why spend some $28Bn on security products and so little on protective measures to prevent cyber attacks?

The attacker’s motivation & objectives are rarely to compromise the physical security or building management system but to use it as the Trojan Horse to gain entry into corporate networks. The interconnected nature of the Internet of Things in Buildings (BIoT) means that cyber attacks can pose risk far beyond the initial point of entry, potentially causing cumulative damages that could permeate into new layers of the enterprise. Extracting important and valuable data.

According to Fred Gordy, director of Cyber security at Intelligent Buildings, LLC, 80% of the time, an attacker’s aim is to infiltrate the corporate network via a building management system, and to get past those controls to accomplish a larger goal or seek a more specific target.

Our report shows that smart building systems and particularly electronic physical security systems can act as “low-hanging fruit” for motivated cyber attackers and will determine the potential impacts and costs of cyber crime to smart building owners, operators and vendors.

Although limited market research has been carried out as to the direct costs of cybercrime on smart buildings, a good indicator of the rising cost implications to businesses is provided by the Ponemon Institute’s annual survey of the costs of cybercrime (see below). This shows that cost impacts are rising steadily over time, with the average cost impact of reported breaches rising 31% between 2013 and 2016 to approaching $10 million.

Meanwhile Cyber security Ventures predicts that annual global costs related to damage and destruction of data, intellectual property theft, lost productivity and fraud are on pace to grow from $3 trillion in 2015 to $6 trillion by 2021.

Costs directly related to BIoT would account for a small proportion of this but given that today it’s the most vulnerable entry point to the Business Enterprise, it shouts out that it needs immediate attention. If not it will create a backlash for IP related physical security devices.

This article was been taken from 2 recent reports - Cyber Security in Smart Commercial Buildings 2017 to 2021 & The Physical Security Business 2016 to 2021.

[contact-form-7 id="3204" title="memoori-newsletter"]

Most Popular Articles

Solaredge Technologies
Energy

SolarEdge Technologies Augments its Solar Energy Management Portfolio

This Research Note explores SolarEdge Technologies, a NASDAQ-listed firm headquartered in Israel with $3 billion in revenues, providing intelligent inverters for photovoltaic systems, primarily in the smart home sector. We examine recent acquisitions, funding, and product launches that augment the company’s software and product portfolio addressing real estate owners and operators in the commercial, industrial, […]

Nordomatic 2024 Map
Smart Buildings

Mapping the Strategic Direction of Nordomatic in Smart Buildings

In this Research Note, we explore the strategic direction of Nordomatic, the leading independent BMS systems integrator in Scandinavia. This Research Note examines the company’s strategic priorities in the smart commercial buildings space. through mapping M&A and investment activity to ascertain the growth ambitions of the business from 2019 to date. Founded in 1967 and headquartered in […]

Subscribe to the Newsletter & get all our Articles & Research Delivered Straight to your Inbox.

Please enter a valid email

Please enter your name

Please enter company name

By signing up you agree to our privacy policy